Content deleted Content added
Stevebroshar (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 475:
:with interpreted linking to 'interpreter' instead of 'interpreted language' as it would make sense. The way I see it is the 'interpreted language' article that lacks content that would clarify differences. That said the list from there provides interpreted yet not scripting languages such as APL, Lisp, R et al. Also note [[Domain-specific language|___domain-specific languages]] such as those used for symbolic mathematics (e.g. Wolfram) and sql. --[[Special:Contributions/79.167.16.139|79.167.16.139]] ([[User talk:79.167.16.139|talk]]) 15:54, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
:In case this ever comes up again, [[markup languages]] are interpreted, but they are very much '''not''' scripting languages. --[[User:Chatul|Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul]] ([[User talk:Chatul|talk]]) 12:52, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
::I don't think a markup language (like HTML) is interpreted. It's not compiled, but interpreted implies a statement-by-statement sequential process. A markup file doesn't have statements; kinda has to be consumed whole; it's data, not code. [[User:Stevebroshar|Stevebroshar]] ([[User talk:Stevebroshar|talk]]) 15:53, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
== What is the example of high level language? ==
| |||