Revision as of 16:43, 8 May 2024 edit Barkeep49 (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Checkusers, New page reviewers, Oversighters, Administrators 42,371 edits →Features of Arbitration Cases: ce ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:39, 8 May 2024 edit undo Cabayi (talk \| contribs) Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators 145,986 edits →Mistakes to avoid: Ignoring the case Next edit →
Line 83: [[wikt:pettifogger\|Pettifoggery]] is likely to create prejudice against your cause, as a person who can win on the merits of their case will probably not resort to [[Wikipedia:Wikilawyering\|wikilawyering]]. Ignoring the case is not a successful strategy. The Arbitration Committee [[:wikt:arbitrate\|arbitrate]]s between the positions presented to it. It should not be relied on to investigate and construct your argument for you. Ignoring the case is not an acceptable strategy for administrators. A failure to respond is seen as a violation of [[WP:ADMINACCT\|the accountability requirements]] and may result in the removal of admin rights pending a conclusion to the case. The case will be suspended for a period (usually limited to 3 months as of May 2024) after which the removal will become permanent. == Notes ==

Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Party Guide/Introduction: Difference between revisions