Content deleted Content added
Reverted 1 edit by Only1fauzan (talk): Rvt unsourced essay |
→Work model: Typo (missing space) |
||
Line 41:
{{Expand section|date=June 2008}}
The distributed model is generally better suited for large projects with partly independent developers, such as the Linux kernel project, because developers can work independently and submit their changes for merge (or rejection). This flexibility allows adopting custom source code contribution workflows, such as the [[integrator workflow]], which is the most widely used. Unlike the centralized model where developers must serialize their work to avoid problems with different versions, in the distributed model, developers can clone the entire history of the code to their local machines. They commit their changes to their local repositories first, creating 'change sets,' before pushing them to the master repository. This approach enables developers to work locally and disconnected, making it more convenient for distributed teams.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Upadhaye |first=Annu |date=22 Feb 2023 |title=Centralized vs Distributed Version Control |url=https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/centralized-vs-distributed-version-control-which-one-should-we-choose/ |access-date=4 April 2024 |website=GFG}}</ref>
===Central and branch repositories===
| |||