Structured concurrency: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
top: copyedit tense
Line 8:
The [[fork–join model]] from the 1960s, embodied by multiprocessing tools like [[OpenMP]], is an early example of a system ensuring all threads have completed before exit. However, Smith argues that this model is not true structured concurrency as the programming language is unaware of the joining behavior, and is thus unable to enforce safety.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Smith |first1=Nathaniel J. |title=Notes on structured concurrency, or: Go statement considered harmful |url=https://vorpus.org/blog/notes-on-structured-concurrency-or-go-statement-considered-harmful/ |date=25 April 2018 |access-date=1 August 2019}}</ref>
 
The concept was formulated in 2016 by Martin Sústrik (creatora developer of [[ZeroMQ]]) with his C library libdill, with [[Go_(programming_language)#Concurrency:_goroutines_and_channels|goroutines]] as a starting point.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Sústrik |first1=Martin |title=Structured Concurrency |url=http://250bpm.com/blog:71 |date=7 February 2016 |access-date=1 August 2019}}</ref> It was further refined in 2017 by Nathaniel J. Smith, who introduced a "nursery pattern" in his [[Python (programming language)|Python]] implementation called Trio.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Smith |first1=Nathaniel J. |title=Announcing Trio |url=https://vorpus.org/blog/announcing-trio/ |date=10 March 2017 |access-date=23 September 2022}}</ref> Meanwhile, Roman Elizarov independently came upon the same ideas while developing an experimental [[coroutine]] library for the [[Kotlin (programming language)|Kotlin language]],<ref>{{cite web |last1=Elizarov |first1=Roman |title=Structured concurrency |url=https://medium.com/@elizarov/structured-concurrency-722d765aa952 |date=12 September 2018 |access-date=21 September 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite AV media |people=Elizarov, Roman |date=11 July 2019 |title=Structured concurrency |medium=Video |language=en |url=https://youtube.com/watch?v=Mj5P47F6nJg&t=2538 |access-date=21 September 2019 |publisher=Hydra Distributed computing conference |minutes=42 |quote="We needed a name and we needed to finalize this whole concept [...] and we stumble onto this blog post [...] by Nathaniel J. Smith."}}</ref> which later became a standard library.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://kotlinlang.org/docs/coroutines-basics.html#structured-concurrency | title=Coroutines basics: Structured concurrency | website=Kotlin | publisher=JetBrains | access-date=3 March 2022}}</ref>
 
In 2021, [[Swift (programming language)|Swift]] adopted structured concurrency.<ref>{{cite web |first1=John |last1=McCall |first2=Joe |last2=Groff |first3=Doug |last3=Gregor |first4=Konrad |last4=Malawski |access-date=3 March 2022 |title=Swift Structured Concurrency Proposal |website=Apple's Swift Evolution repo |publisher=GitHub |url=https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/main/proposals/0304-structured-concurrency.md}}</ref> Later that year, a draft proposal was published to add structured concurrency to [[Java (programming language)|Java]].<ref>{{cite web |last1=Pressler |first1=Ron |website=[[OpenJDK]] |publisher=Oracle |access-date=3 March 2022 |title=JEP draft: Structured Concurrency (Incubator) |url=https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/8277129}}</ref>