Talk:Range coding: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
{{talkheader}}
Line 88:
:::::::Oh, I see. I get your point now. I was missing the obvious - range encoding is notable because it's believed to be free from arithmetic coding related patents. My 'clarification' in the article is certainly woefully inadequate. I'll edit the article to make its notability clearer (as I've left it completely obscure), though you're right that it needs more knowledgeable input.
:::::::--[[User:Simon G Best|Simon G Best]] 17:29, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 
:::::::"If you can find someone who claims that range coding, as practiced by in large, violates a patent — contradicting [[User:Antaeus Feldspar|Antaeus Feldspar]]'s earlier comment — that would prove me wrong about this." I'm a bit distressed, because I think this comment could easily be misread to claim that ''I'' made a comment somewhere claiming that range coding violates patents, which I have not. -- [[User:Antaeus Feldspar|Antaeus Feldspar]] 13:50, 13 April 2007 (UTC)