Revision as of 06:17, 20 May 2024 edit 103.36.125.209 (talk) High Court of Singapore's decision which rejects the Basic Structure Doctrine to be applicable in the Singaporean context has now been provided with a citation. Tag: Visual edit ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:53, 23 May 2024 edit undo Egidio24 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 10,753 edits m v2.05 - Fix errors for CW project (Reference before punctuation) Tag: WPCleaner Next edit →
Line 13: The Supreme Court's position on constitutional amendments laid out in its judgements is that Parliament can amend the Constitution but cannot destroy its "basic structure". The basic structure doctrine was rejected by the [[High Court of Singapore]].<ref>''Teo Soh Lung v Minister of Home Affairs'' [1989] 1 SLR(R) 461</ref>. It was initially also rejected by the [[Federal Court of Malaysia]], but was later accepted by it. Conversely, the doctrine was initially approved in [[Belize]] by the [[Supreme Court of Belize\|Supreme Court]] but was later reversed on appeal by the Belize Court of Appeal.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web \|date=15 May 2014 \|title=Civil Appeal No. 18 19 21 of 2012 THE ATTORNEY GENERAL v THE BRITISH CARIBBEAN BANK LIMITED v DEAN BOYCE and FORTIS ENERGY INTERNATIONAL (BELIZE) INC v THE ATTORNEY GENERAL \|url=https://www.belizejudiciary.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Civil-Appeal-No.-18-19-21-of-2012-THE-ATTORNEY-GENERAL-v-THE-BRITISH-CARIBBEAN-BANK-LIMITED-v-DEAN-BOYCE-and-FORTIS-ENERGY-INTERNATIONAL-BELIZE-INC-v-THE-ATTORNEY-GENERAL.pdf \|access-date=20 December 2023 \|website=Judiciary of Belize \|at=Section [3](iii)}}</ref> ==Definition==

Basic structure doctrine: Difference between revisions