Revision as of 09:51, 5 January 2024 edit TheImaCow (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 85,342 edits Assessment: Cryptography, Computing, +banner shell (C) (Rater) ← Previous edit		Revision as of 05:05, 14 June 2024 edit undo 2405:205:128d:e4ec::1e9e:20b1 (talk) →Instagram I'd heak: new section Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic Next edit →
Line 44: The section on deleting the salt to provide "key strengthening" seems suspect. Deleting the salt and requiring legitimate users to brute force attack their own stuff doesn't seem reasonable. The quoted links are to offline sources. (Journals/books) Can anyone find an online source for this? And is there a known implementation that uses this technique today? The citations don't directly support this paragraph. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Javacodehead\|Javacodehead]] ([[User talk:Javacodehead#top\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Javacodehead\|contribs]]) 19:31, 30 December 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> == Instagram I'd heak == Pa@[[User:Ss 158\|Ss 158]] [[Special:Contributions/2405:205:128D:E4EC:0:0:1E9E:20B1\|2405:205:128D:E4EC:0:0:1E9E:20B1]] ([[User talk:2405:205:128D:E4EC:0:0:1E9E:20B1\|talk]]) 05:05, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Talk:Key derivation function: Difference between revisions