Content deleted Content added
→Lacking: Reply |
→NPOV issues 2023: Reply |
||
Line 60:
:::Accurately representing an opposing viewpoint is not spreading anti-science propaganda. [[Special:Contributions/2601:547:E01:1DC0:1C34:FFF1:FA7C:EC11|2601:547:E01:1DC0:1C34:FFF1:FA7C:EC11]] ([[User talk:2601:547:E01:1DC0:1C34:FFF1:FA7C:EC11|talk]]) 12:41, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
::::We do represent it. Just we don't represent it as valid/true. It is a conflict between mainstream science and scientifically inane views. [[User:tgeorgescu|tgeorgescu]] ([[User talk:tgeorgescu|talk]]) 12:51, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
:Well done Hausa Warrior, my conclusion exactly. I had to stop halfway through reading it as a start the first time in a long time of reading Wiki that I was reminded “oh yes these articles can be written by any old person, with no body of evidence and slanted to whatever bias they like”. And this article certainly reeks of it. The emotionally charged way that Hob Gadling is replying makes it so obvious. [[Special:Contributions/2A02:6B66:48F4:0:B523:38E1:3F7F:1EEE|2A02:6B66:48F4:0:B523:38E1:3F7F:1EEE]] ([[User talk:2A02:6B66:48F4:0:B523:38E1:3F7F:1EEE|talk]]) 08:22, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
== Is it fair to include Plantinga on this page? ==
| |||