Content deleted Content added
→NPOV issues 2023: Reply |
Hob Gadling (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 61:
::::We do represent it. Just we don't represent it as valid/true. It is a conflict between mainstream science and scientifically inane views. [[User:tgeorgescu|tgeorgescu]] ([[User talk:tgeorgescu|talk]]) 12:51, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
:Well done Hausa Warrior, my conclusion exactly. I had to stop halfway through reading it as a start the first time in a long time of reading Wiki that I was reminded “oh yes these articles can be written by any old person, with no body of evidence and slanted to whatever bias they like”. And this article certainly reeks of it. The emotionally charged way that Hob Gadling is replying makes it so obvious. [[Special:Contributions/2A02:6B66:48F4:0:B523:38E1:3F7F:1EEE|2A02:6B66:48F4:0:B523:38E1:3F7F:1EEE]] ([[User talk:2A02:6B66:48F4:0:B523:38E1:3F7F:1EEE|talk]]) 08:22, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
::This is bullshit. The article is based on reliable sources. Your problem seems to be that the only sources you have been exposed to are far away from any reliability, so you believe in the false rumors spread by creationists instead of actual facts.
::If you have any concrete issues instead of vague accusations, you are welcome here. As is, your writings are not helpful. --[[User:Hob Gadling|Hob Gadling]] ([[User talk:Hob Gadling|talk]]) 10:28, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
== Is it fair to include Plantinga on this page? ==
| |||