Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) from Module talk:WikiProject banner) (bot |
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) from Module talk:WikiProject banner) (bot |
||
Line 61:
::It looks like {{tl|WPBannerMeta/hooks/taskforces/templatepage}} may also have become unused and deleteable. – [[User:Jonesey95|Jonesey95]] ([[User talk:Jonesey95|talk]]) 14:32, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
:::I believe it is only [[Template:WikiProject Indian roads]], [[Template:WikiProject U.S. Roads]] and possibly some other roads projects that are using this depcrecated code now — Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 14:22, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
== Classifying subpages in main talk ==
{{moved to|Template talk:Pagetype}}
All pages not in article space are automatically detected as being non-articles. But Gonnym pointed out that we have some subpages in Main talk space (e.g. [[Talk:Multiverse (Marvel Cinematic Universe)/FAQ]]) which should also be classified as non-articles. The types I have seen are FAQ pages like the above, or talk archive pages. It is not clear how we should classify them (e.g. Project-class) or just use the default NA-class for these types of page. Does anyone have any opinion? — Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 17:50, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
:I'd say that talk archive can be NA like regular talk. /FAQ (and maybe /GA) ideally should be project but if that is an issue then NA can work also (or allow manual override with the normal class parameter). [[User:Gonnym|Gonnym]] ([[User talk:Gonnym|talk]]) 08:15, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
::I think I would prefer to treat all these subpages in the same way, rather that try to guess what they are based on the name of the page — Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 11:10, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
| |||