Revision as of 03:55, 30 May 2024 edit David Eppstein (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 235,633 edits Undid revision 1226346618 by 60.248.110.152 (talk) perhaps you didn't notice that the sum is over NEGATIVE as well as positive indices Tag: Undo ← Previous edit		Revision as of 06:32, 9 July 2024 edit undo David Eppstein (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 235,633 edits →Definition and examples: dubiously significant, badly sourced, and dated Next edit →
Line 21: p(10000) &= 36,\!167,\!251,\!325,\!\dots,\!906,\!916,\!435,\!144 \approx 3.61673\times 10^{106} \end{align}</math> {{As of\|2022\|June}}, the largest known [[prime number]] among the values of {{math\|''p''(''n'')}} is {{math\|''p''(1289844341)}}, with 40,000 decimal digits.{{r\|caldwell}}<ref>{{citation \|title=PrimePage Primes: p(1289844341) \|url=https://primes.utm.edu/primes/page.php?id=130336 \|website=primes.utm.edu \|access-date=30 June 2022}}</ref> Until March 2022, this was also the largest prime that has been proved using [[elliptic curve primality proving]].<ref>{{citation \|title=The Top Twenty: Elliptic Curve Primality Proof \|url=https://primes.utm.edu/top20/page.php?id=27 \|website=primes.utm.edu \|access-date=30 June 2022}}</ref> ==Generating function==

Partition function (number theory): Difference between revisions