Wikipedia:Wikipedia has more...: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 12:
And any combination of the above.
 
There is never any suggestion of what the ideal situation should be – How many chemists we should cover? Should we delete some of our coverage of Britney Spears? And of course never any offer to leap into the breach and help. (One early example says no-one will read itWikipedia anyway.)
 
Apart from the logical fallacy (assuming that because X is better covered than Y, Y is badly covered), these claims are often – as I like to say – ''plain wrong''.