Talk:Objections to evolution: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:34, 19 July 2024

Revision as of 04:30, 22 July 2024

Line 90:

::Except Hoyle's argument very specifically supports an intelligent designer who designed things without starting with [[abiogenesis]]. Since it is an argument against abiogenesis, it makes sense to put the argument here. On the other hand, Plantinga's argument is specifically against metaphysical naturalism. And it cannot be and has never been used against evolution in any way. So, it doesn't logically belong here. The article itself makes it clear that it is an argument against metaphysical naturalism and not evolution. So, it doesn't make sense to put it here at all. It belongs to the article [[Naturalism (philosophy)|naturalism]]. [[User:Asaduzzaman Khan Shahriar|Asaduzzaman Khan Shahriar]] ([[User talk:Asaduzzaman Khan Shahriar|talk]]) 09:02, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

==Hovind==

Young Earth creationist Kent Hovind blames communism, socialism, World War I, World War II, racism, the Holocaust, Stalin's war crimes, the Vietnam War, and Pol Pot's Killing Fields on evolution, as well as the increase in crime, unwed mothers, and other social ills."

Blames them on what or for what?

Young Earth creationist Kent Hovind blames communism, socialism, World War I, World War II, racism, the Holocaust, Stalin's war crimes, the Vietnam War, and Pol Pot's Killing Fields on evolution, as well as the increase in crime, unwed mothers, and other social ill" [[Special:Contributions/86.191.214.39|86.191.214.39]] ([[User talk:86.191.214.39|talk]]) 07:16, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

:….Hovind blames <nowiki>[long list]</nowiki> on evolution, as well as <nowiki>[short list]</nowiki>. Not entirely easy to parse, but conveys the information you asked about. [[User:Sjö|Sjö]] ([[User talk:Sjö|talk]]) 08:18, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

::I think it is easier to read now. --[[User:Hob Gadling|Hob Gadling]] ([[User talk:Hob Gadling|talk]]) 08:28, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

== Isolated systems ==