Content deleted Content added
Tags: Manual revert Reverted |
Undid revision 1239034193 by SB-Euler (talk) no, this is not right: the sum is over *both positive and negative k*, the negative values of k account for the terms you (mistakenly) think are missing |
||
Line 50:
<!-- Note: The following is the same formula as in the source, but in a more compact form. See [[Talk:Partition function (number theory)#Recurrence relations]]. -->
<math display="block">\begin{align}
p(n) &= \sum_{k \in \Z\setminus\{0\}} (-1)^{k+1}
&= p(n-1) + p(n-2)-p(n-5)-p(n-7) +p(n-12) +p(n-15) - p(n-22) -\cdots
\end{align}</math>
|