Multiuser DOS: differenze tra le versioni
Contenuto cancellato Contenuto aggiunto
m +pezzettino |
m +cat |
||
Riga 20:
Evoluzione del più vecchi sistemi operativi '''Concurrent CP/M''' e '''Concurrent DOS''', venne sviluppato originariamente da [[Digital Research]], e discende direttamente dai precedenti [[CP/M]] ed [[MP/M]].
La prima versione di CP/M per il PC IBM, '''CP/M-86''', non fu un successo commerciale, dal momento che l'[[MS-DOS]] di [[Microsoft]] offriva più o meno le stesse possibilità ad un prezzo considerevolmente inferiore. In maniera del tutto simile ad MS-DOS 1.0, CP/M-86 non sfruttava appieno la potenza e le capacità del nuovo sistema a [[16 bit]]. Essa venne presto soppiantata da un implementazione del "fratello maggiore" del CP/M con supporto [[multitasking]], '''MP/M-86''', cosa che rese un PC un sistema multiutente in grado di gestire più accessi contemporaneamente attraverso [[Terminale (informatica)|terminali]] collegai alle porte seriali. L'ambiente presentato dava a ciascun utente l'impressione di avere il pieno controllo sul sistema.
Dal momento che i terminali costavano molto meno di un PC del tempo, essi offrivano risparmi considerevoli, e facilitavano l'utilizzo di applicazioni multiutente come quelli per il controllo di conti bancari o di azioni in un periodo in cui le reti di computer erano rare, molto costose e difficili da implementare.
<!-- CP/M-86 and MP/M-86 were later merged to create Concurrent CP/M (also known as ''CCP/M''), which offered more complete CP/M-86 compatibility in addition to MP/M-86's multiuser capabilities. ▼
▲CP/M-86 and MP/M-86 were later merged to create Concurrent CP/M (also known as ''CCP/M''), which offered more complete CP/M-86 compatibility in addition to MP/M-86's multiuser capabilities.
As the origin of MS-DOS was as a clone of CP/M, this operating system also offered limited compatibility with MS-DOS - simple MS-DOS applications which did not directly access the screen or other hardware could be run under CCP/M. For example, although a console program such as [[PKZip]] worked perfectly and offered more facilities than the CP/M-native ''Arc'' archiver, more complex applications which performed screen manipulations, such as [[WordStar]] for DOS, would not and thus native CCP/M versions were required.
Riga 42 ⟶ 38:
MDOS was also unable to use many common MS-DOS additions such as network stacks, and it was limited in its ability to support later developments in the PC-compatible world, such as graphics adaptors, sound cards, CD-ROM drives and mice. Although many of these were soon rectified - for example, graphical terminals were developed, allowing users to use [[Color_Graphics_Adapter|CGA]], [[Enhanced_Graphics_Adapter|EGA]] and [[VGA]] software - it was less flexible in this regard than a network of individual PCs, and as the prices of these fell, it became less and less competitive, although it still offered benefits in terms of management and TCO (total cost of ownership.) Unlike MP/M, it never became popular as a multitasking OS for single users, partly because of license costs and partly because of the requirement for special device drivers - unlike multitasking DOS additions such as Quarterdeck's [[DESQview]].
-->▼
[[Categoria:Sistemi operativi real-time]]
▲[[Category:Digital Research]]
▲-->
|