Content deleted Content added
→Rewrite: Reply |
|||
Line 36:
:{{Ping|AlexHajnal}}'''Draftify'''? It appears to have been written like an advert by vendors of "in-memory" database technology(UNDECLARED [[WP:COI]]), and doesn't really explain why it's technically better (which would basically be for operations that need big matrices and clusters that will be read entirely and more than once (otherwise classic read on demand kind of databases would be adequate). I have marked it appropriately. Should it be moved to draft space?[[User:Ethanpet113|Ethanpet113]] ([[User talk:Ethanpet113|talk]]) 08:46, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
:Agreed. [[User:Dbrusilo|Dbrusilo]] ([[User talk:Dbrusilo|talk]]) 23:00, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
:{{Ping|Ethanpet113}} Honestly I think the whole article should be nuked. I don't know what the procedure for doing so is though. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:AlexHajnal|AlexHajnal]] ([[User talk:AlexHajnal#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/AlexHajnal|contribs]]) </small>
|