Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 10:18, 3 September 2024

Revision as of 10:19, 3 September 2024

Line 614:

:@[[User:Root Equus|Root Equus]]: see [[WP:MINREF]]. Basically, whenever a reader might challenge or even wonder if something is really true, or what source a statement is based on, there should be the source cited next to it. This is especially important in articles on living people ([[WP:BLP]]). Also, all private personal and family details, such as [[WP:DOB|DOB]], must be clearly supported by reliable sources. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 09:51, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

== 10:19, 3 September 2024 review of submission by Sarajmartin24 ==

{{Lafc|username=Sarajmartin24|ts=10:19, 3 September 2024|draft=Draft:ESG_Summit_Europe}}

Hello,

Thank you for reviewing our submission. We understand that the article was declined due to the following reasons:

"This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources."

"This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject."

We have carefully reviewed your feedback and have made further adjustments to the article to ensure it is written in a neutral and academic tone. We have also ensured that the references used are from external, reputable sources such as Forbes, Cinco Días, Bolsamanía, FUNDS PEOPLE, Invertia, and Corresponsables—all of which are well-established and reliable media outlets that have covered the event in depth.

We are unsure what additional steps are required to meet the criteria for reliable sources, as the current references are from recognized and reputable media organizations that provide independent coverage of the event. Could you please provide us with more specific guidance on why these sources are not considered adequate?

We would greatly appreciate more detailed feedback on how we can further improve the submission to meet Wikipedia's standards.

Thank you for your time and assistance.

Best regards, [[User:Sarajmartin24|Sarajmartin24]] ([[User talk:Sarajmartin24|talk]]) 10:19, 3 September 2024 (UTC)