Revision as of 18:30, 26 August 2024 edit Qwerfjkl (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Rollbackers 216,529 edits m Added 1 {{Bare URL PDF}} tag(s) using a script. For other recently-tagged pages with bare URLs, see Category:Articles with bare URLs for citations from August 2024 and Category:Articles with PDF format bare URLs for citations ← Previous edit		Revision as of 06:11, 10 September 2024 edit undo Citation bot (talk \| contribs) Bots 5,866,512 edits Removed URL that duplicated identifier. \| Use this bot. Report bugs. \| Suggested by Grimes2 \| #UCB_webform 258/953 Next edit →
Line 7: Currently, most model transformation languages are being developed in academia. The [[Object Management Group\|OMG]] has standardised a family of model transformation languages called [[QVT]], but the field is still immature.<ref name="FranceRumpe"/> There are ongoing debates regarding the benefits of specialised model transformation languages, compared to the use of general-purpose programming languages (GPLs) such as [[Java (programming language)\|Java]].<ref>https://www.jot.fm/issues/issue_2019_03/article7.pdf {{Bare URL PDF\|date=August 2024}}</ref> While GPLs have advantages in terms of more widely-available practitioner knowledge and tool support, the specialised transformation languages do provide more declarative facilities and more powerful specialised features to support model transformations.<ref>{{cite journal ~~\| url=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10664-022-10194-7~~ \| doi=10.1007/s10664-022-10194-7 \| title=Advantages and disadvantages of (Dedicated) model transformation languages \| date=2022 \| last1=Höppner \| first1=Stefan \| last2=Haas \| first2=Yves \| last3=Tichy \| first3=Matthias \| last4=Juhnke \| first4=Katharina \| journal=Empirical Software Engineering \| volume=27 \| issue=6 \| s2cid=251644010 \| doi-access=free \| arxiv=2201.13348 }}</ref> == Available transformation languages ==

Model transformation language: Difference between revisions