Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
Added date. Removed parameters. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Grimes2 | #UCB_webform 308/1603
No edit summary
Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 107:
}}
 
The United States is among the majority offew countries around the world that have not ratified the Vienna Convention on Road Signs and Signals (based primarily on European signage traditions), and the FHWA MUTCD differs significantly from the Vienna Convention. Apart from the 1971 effort to adopt several Vienna Convention-inspired symbol signs (as explained above), achieving worldwide uniformity in traffic control devices was never a priority for AASHTO because the number of motorists driving regularly on multiple continents was relatively small during the 20th century.<ref name="Johnson" />
 
[[Warning sign]]s (alerting drivers of unexpected or hazardous conditions) tend to be more verbose than their Vienna Convention counterparts.<ref name="Johnson" /> On the other hand, MUTCD guide signs (directing or informing road users of their ___location or of destinations) tend to be less verbose, since they are optimized for reading at high speeds on freeways and expressways.<ref name="Johnson" />