Wikipedia:Picture peer review: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
my first peer review request |
|||
Line 281:
'''Comments:'''
* '''Comment''' No background visible means there's no sense of scale. I can barely tell which way is up or what is on fire. Subject is also cut off at the top. I realize its hard to photograph fire at night, but you need to provide some setting or else it is just orange smudges on a black background. Might work better if you photographed at dusk. Compression artifacts aside, [http://biology.clc.uc.edu/graphics/gabeteri/Evening%20Bonfire.gif this] is a much better photo, IMHO. --[[User:Dgies|Dgies]] 06:19, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
'''Seconder:'''
*
<!-- additional comments go above this line -->
<br style="clear:both;" />
===[[Wikipedia:Picture peer review|Idea Leuconoe aka Paper Kite aka the Rice Paper butterfly.]]===
[[Image:20070414_idea_leuconoe_strandberg.jpg|thumb|Idea Leuconoe]]
[[Image:20070414_idea_leuconoe_strandberg_crop.jpg|thumb|Idea Leuconoe]]
I took this pic of a butterfly. I am pretty proud of it and I hope others like it too. I uploaded a cropped version aswell. (PS: this is the first time I do this with any pic so I hope I am doing this the right way.)
[:)]-|--<
*Nominate and '''support'''. - [[User:PER9000|PER9000]] 15:51, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
*
'''Comments:'''
*
'''Seconder:'''
| |||