Zero-configuration networking: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m DNS-SD with multicast: linking Wikipedia page
m unpiped links using script
Line 40:
Use of either NetBIOS or LLMNR services on Windows is essentially automatic, since using standard DNS client APIs will result in the use of either NetBIOS or LLMNR depending on what name is being resolved (whether the name is a local name or not), the network configuration in effect (e.g. DNS suffixes in effect) and (in corporate networks) the policies in effect (whether LLMNR or NetBIOS are disabled), although developers may opt into bypassing these services for individual address lookups.
 
The mDNS and LLMNR protocols have minor differences in their approach to name resolution. mDNS allows a network device to choose a ___domain name in the [[.local|local]] DNS [[namespace]] and announce it using a special multicast IP address. This introduces special semantics for the [[top-level ___domain name|top-level ___domain]] ''local'',<ref>{{Citation | publisher = IETF | type = electronic mail message | url = http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg37126.html | title = Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard | access-date = 2006-02-10 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20081207202354/http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg37126.html | archive-date = 2008-12-07 | url-status = dead }}</ref> which is considered a problem by some members of the IETF.<ref>{{Citation | publisher = IETF | type = electronic mail message | url = http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg37773.html | title = Re: Summary of the LLMNR Last Call | access-date = 2006-02-10 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20081207202402/http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg37773.html | archive-date = 2008-12-07 | url-status = dead }}</ref> The current LLMNR draft allows a network device to choose any ___domain name, which is considered a security risk by some members of the IETF.<ref>{{Citation | publisher = IETF | type = electronic mail message | url = http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg37740.html | title = Summary of the LLMNR Last Call | access-date = 2005-11-11 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20081207202357/http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg37740.html | archive-date = 2008-12-07 | url-status = dead }}</ref> mDNS is compatible with DNS-SD as described in the next section, while LLMNR is not.<ref>{{Citation | publisher = IETF | type = electronic mail message | url = http://www.mhonarc.org/archive/html/ietf/2005-08/msg00494.html | title = More details on the differences}}</ref>
 
==Service discovery==
Line 60:
 
====DNS-SD with multicast====
mDNS uses packets similar to [[Domain Name System#DNS message format|unicast DNS]] to resolve hostnames except they are sent over a multicast link. Each host listens on the mDNS port, 5353, transmitted to a well-known multicast address and resolves requests for the [[resource record|DNS record]] of its ''.local'' hostname (e.g. the [[List of DNS record types#A|A]], [[List of DNS record types#AAAA|AAAA]], [[CNAME record|CNAME]]) to its IP address. When an mDNS client needs to resolve a local hostname to an IP address, it sends a DNS request for that name to the well-known multicast address; the computer with the corresponding A/AAAA record replies with its IP address. The mDNS multicast address is {{IPaddr|224.0.0.251}} for IPv4 and {{IPaddr|ff02::fb}} for IPv6 link-local addressing.
 
DNS Service Discovery aka [[DNS-SD]] requests can also be sent using mDNS to yield zero-configuration DNS-SD.{{Ref RFC|6763}} This uses DNS [[PTR record|PTR]], SRV, [[TXT record|TXT]] records to advertise instances of service types, ___domain names for those instances, and optional configuration parameters for connecting to those instances. But SRV records can now resolve to ''.local'' ___domain names, which mDNS can resolve to local IP addresses.
 
====Support====
DNS-SD is used by Apple products, most network printers, many Linux distributions including [[Debian]] and [[Ubuntu (operating system)|Ubuntu]],<ref>{{cite web|title=Ubuntu 15.10 desktop manifest|url=http://releases.ubuntu.com/wily/ubuntu-15.10-desktop-amd64.manifest|publisher=Ubuntu|access-date=23 October 2015}}</ref> and a number of third-party products for various operating systems. For example, many [[OS X]] network applications written by Apple, including [[Safari (web browser)|Safari]], [[iChat]], and [[Messages (Apple)|Messages]], can use DNS-SD to locate nearby servers and peer-to-peer clients. Windows 10 includes support for DNS-SD for applications written using JavaScript.<ref name="WindowsDnssdNamespace">{{cite web|title=Windows.Networking.ServiceDiscovery.Dnssd namespace|url=https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/bb870632(v=vs.85).aspx|website=Windows Dev Center|publisher=Microsoft|access-date=1 November 2015}}</ref> Individual applications may include their own support in older versions of the operating system, such that most instant messaging and [[VoIP]] clients on Windows support DNS-SD. Some [[Unix]], [[BSD]], and Linux distributions also include DNS-SD. For example, Ubuntu ships [[Avahi (software)|Avahi]], an mDNS/DNS-SD implementation, in its base distribution.
 
===UPnP===
Line 71:
 
====SSDP====
[[Simple Service Discovery Protocol]] (SSDP) is a UPnP protocol, used in [[Windows XP]] and later. SSDP uses HTTP notification announcements that give a service-type [[Uniform Resource Identifier|URI]] and a Unique Service Name (USN). Service types are regulated by the Universal Plug and Play Steering Committee. SSDP is supported by many printer, NAS and appliance manufacturers such as Brother. It is supported by certain brands of network equipment, and in many [[SOHO network|SOHO]] firewall appliances, where host computers behind it may pierce holes for applications. It is also used in [[home theater PC]] systems to facilitate media exchange between host computers and the media center.
 
====DLNA====
Line 94:
 
==Security issues==
Because mDNS operates under a different trust model than unicast DNS—trusting the entire network rather than a designated DNS server, it is vulnerable to [[spoofing attack]]s by any system within the same [[broadcast ___domain]]. Like [[Simple Network Management Protocol|SNMP]] and many other network management protocols, it can also be used by attackers to quickly gain detailed knowledge of the network and its machines.<ref>{{Citation | url = http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/name-mdns-poisoning-attacks-inside-the-lan/ | title = Name (MDNS) Poisoning Attacks Inside the LAN | publisher = GNU citizen | type = World Wide Web log | date = 23 January 2008}}</ref> Because of this, applications should still authenticate and encrypt traffic to remote hosts (e.g. via [[RSA (cryptosystem)|RSA]], [[Secure Shell|SSH]], etc.) after discovering and resolving them through DNS-SD/mDNS. LLMNR suffers from similar vulnerabilities.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.pentestpartners.com/security-blog/how-to-get-windows-to-give-you-credentials-through-llmnr/ |title=How to get Windows to give you credentials through LLMNR |first=David |last=Lodge |date=22 September 2015 |website=Pen Test Partners}}</ref>
 
==Major implementations==
Line 104:
 
===Avahi===
[[Avahi (software)|Avahi]] is a Zeroconf implementation for [[Linux]] and [[Berkeley Software Distribution|BSD]]s. It implements [[IPv4LL]], mDNS and DNS-SD. It is part of most Linux distributions, and is installed by default on some. If run in conjunction with nss-mdns, it also offers host name resolution.<ref>{{Citation | url = http://0pointer.de/lennart/projects/nss-mdns | title = nss-mdns 0.10 | last = Lennart | publisher = 0 pointer | place = [[Germany|DE]]}}</ref>
 
Avahi also implements binary compatibility libraries that emulate Bonjour and the historical mDNS implementation Howl, so software made to use those implementations can also utilize Avahi through the emulation interfaces.
Line 116:
===Link-local IPv4 addresses===
Where no DHCP server is available to assign a host an IP address, the host can select its own [[link-local address]]. Using a link-local address, hosts can communicate over this link but only locally; Access to other networks and the Internet is not possible. There are some link-local IPv4 address implementations available:
* Apple Mac OS and MS Windows have supported link-local addresses since [[Windows 98]] and [[Mac OS 8#Mac OS 8.5|Mac OS 8.5]] (both released in 1998).<ref name="rfc3927" /> Apple released its open-source implementation in the [[Darwin (operating system)|Darwin]] bootp package.
* [[Avahi (software)|Avahi]] contains an implementation of IPv4LL in the avahi-autoipd tool.
* Zero-Conf IP (zcip)<ref>{{Citation | url = http://zeroconf.sourceforge.net/ | title = zcip | publisher = Source forge}}</ref>