Content deleted Content added
Tobyhoward (talk | contribs) Removed duplication of accolades. |
|||
Line 74:
The film has fared less well on reappraisal. In 2001, the ''Wallflower Critical Guide'' noted the creativity in cinematography and editing, but said it disrupted the storytelling.<ref>{{cite book |editor1=Yoram Allon |editor2=Del Cullen |editor3=Hannah Patterson |title=Contemporary British and Irish Film Directors: A Wallflower Critical Guide |publisher=Wallflower Press |date=2001 |isbn=1903364213 |page=199}}</ref>
In 2016, ''[[The Hollywood Reporter]]'' ranked it the 49th best film to win the Palme d'Or (out of the 69 films to win up to that point), stating it "hasn't aged well" but the setting was a great asset.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/lists/cannes-palme-dor-winners-ranked-891143/item/best-intentions-palme-dor-winners-891108 |title=Cannes: All the Palme d'Or Winners, Ranked |last=Staff |date=10 May 2016 |access-date=7 June 2017 |work=[[The Hollywood Reporter]]}}</ref>
In 2020, as part of a profile of Tushingham, Stuart Jeffries in ''[[The Guardian]]'' called the film "painful to watch", citing "the levity with which the film treats rape, not to mention Nancy's weird hysteria, is bound to make modern audiences a little queasy."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2020/jan/28/rita-tushingham-interview-taste-of-honey-shock-60s |title=Rita Tushingham on life after A Taste of Honey |last=Jeffries |first=Stuart |date=28 January 2020 |access-date=4 January 2024 |work=[[The Guardian]]}}</ref>
Line 154:
==External links==
*{{IMDb title|id=0059362|title=The Knack …and How to Get It}}
* {{
*{{rotten-tomatoes|knackand_how_to_get_it}}
Line 174:
[[Category:1960s English-language films]]
[[Category:1960s British films]]
[[Category:English-language sex comedy films]]
| |||