Content deleted Content added
→Concision: Reply |
→Concision: Reply |
||
Line 151:
::I admit, however, that i hav a habit of being aggressiv about editing articles for concision. [[User:Solomonfromfinland|Solomonfromfinland]] ([[User talk:Solomonfromfinland|talk]]) 15:11, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
:::"In modern mathematics" and "today" are not necessarily equivalent. "Modern mathematics" is quite old, actually. And yes, I agree with the removal of the word "function" when it appears later in the article. [[User:A1E6|A1E6]] ([[User talk:A1E6|talk]]) 15:27, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
::::Thank you. [[User:Solomonfromfinland|Solomonfromfinland]] ([[User talk:Solomonfromfinland|talk]]) 15:29, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
::The section “'''Right-angled triangle definitions'''”, begins, “If the acute angle θ is given, then any right triangles with an angle of θ are similar to each other.” How about, “Any two right triangles with the same acute angle θ, are similar to each other.” (I include a comma after a long subject of a sentence, such as here, for legibility.) Also, could “to each other” be removed?
::The next sentence is, “This means that the ratio of any two side lengths depends only on θ.” Could “This means that”, be replaced with “Therefore” or “Thus” or “That is,”?
| |||