Content deleted Content added
Add missing signatures, fix order, remove old bot notification |
|||
Line 7:
}}
== Use British English spelling for BDD ==▼
In the "Introducing BDD" article the term is coined as "behaviour-driven development". The rest of the article seems to be in American English, but the term should always be in British English according to [[Wikipedia:Manual of style#National varieties of English]]. [[User:Spur|Spur]] ([[User talk:Spur|talk]]) 01:43, 4 July 2012 (UTC)▼
Let's talk about it before speedily deleting this article again... I'm sorry the first version was so information free... I just wanted to create a space to discuss the topic. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:KellyCoinGuy|KellyCoinGuy]] ([[User talk:KellyCoinGuy#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/KellyCoinGuy|contribs]]) 22:53, 21 October 2005 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Xsign -->
▲==Lack of information==
I was about to add my humble opinion about this article, but I see from the "Talk" here that many people agree that the article is rather meaningless. Or maybe the subject (BDD) is meaningless and vague. How about "BDD is just having the testers talk to the users..." I need to know what BDD is because I am about to go on a job interview and BDD is one of the requirements. --25 July 2019▼
The message can't go! The article, especially the beginning, is in terrible condition. --[[User:Mislav|Mislav]] 22:04, 12 October 2006 (UTC)▼
So, I just made some massive changes to this. Mostly it's based on Dan's stuff, together with some things from my blog and the XP list on Yahoo, that I know he's agreed with. Will add some in-text citations as soon as I have time.▼
I've updated the article. Maybe the context message can go now. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/217.136.137.161|217.136.137.161]] ([[User talk:217.136.137.161#top|talk]]) 16:45, 7 May 2006 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Xsign -->
Hope this serves as a good base for further edits!▼
▲The message can't go! The article, especially the beginning, is in terrible condition. --[[User:Mislav|Mislav]] 22:04, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
[[User:Featheredwings|Featheredwings]] ([[User talk:Featheredwings|talk]]) 09:27, 18 February 2008 (UTC)▼
==Dave Astels==
Dave Astels also influences BDD. See his ideas and framework (at the moment in Ruby) in this video:
''Beyond Test Driven Development - Behaviour Driven Development'' ( 302 MB, 47:40 min ) Google TechTalks March 17, 2006 [http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8135690990081075324]. --[[User:Erkan Yilmaz|Erkan Yilmaz]] 20:31, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
I'm dubious about the accuracy of this article. Many of the things it says about BDD are things I thought were already true of test-driven development. Needs more cites. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:24.6.102.150|24.6.102.150]] ([[User talk:24.6.102.150|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/24.6.102.150|contribs]]) 01:02, 18 March 2007</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
==Update==
▲So, I just made some massive changes to this. Mostly it's based on Dan's stuff, together with some things from my blog and the XP list on Yahoo, that I know he's agreed with. Will add some in-text citations as soon as I have time.
▲Hope this serves as a good base for further edits!
▲[[User:Featheredwings|Featheredwings]] ([[User talk:Featheredwings|talk]]) 09:27, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
== What is the relationship with traditional specification as language (CLU, Eiffel)? ==
Line 43 ⟶ 42:
== Ubiquitous Language ==
I'm not clear on the relationship to the ubiquitous language. Is BDD forming a ubiquitous language for testing or if you are practicing DDD with BDD is the ubiquitous language used in the tests? <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/82.41.217.214|82.41.217.214]] ([[User talk:82.41.217.214|talk]]) 21:46, 20 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Line 63:
----
[[Behavior Driven Development]] → {{no redirect|1=Behavior-driven development}} –
Line 71 ⟶ 70:
--[[User:DavidBiesack|DavidBiesack]] ([[User talk:DavidBiesack|talk]]) 13:29, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a [[WP:RM|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.''</div><!-- Template:RM bottom -->
▲== Use British English spelling for BDD ==
▲In the "Introducing BDD" article the term is coined as "behaviour-driven development". The rest of the article seems to be in American English, but the term should always be in British English according to [[Wikipedia:Manual of style#National varieties of English]]. [[User:Spur|Spur]] ([[User talk:Spur|talk]]) 01:43, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
== Gherkin is no longer specific to Cucumber ==
Line 99 ⟶ 102:
Reading the article it suggests that the key drivers for BDD are the stakeholders but typically they are totally clueless about everything outside the business ___domain. For example if you want to use TDD on non-business ___domain units such as form or graphics composition libraries interopability libraries import export libraries application frameworks or pretty much any other component developed that is generic enough to satisfy a projects architecture - why would you even want to come up with a convaluted warping of a user story to somehow justify reading or writing a byte of data somewhere or another? ZhuLien [[Special:Contributions/66.249.80.203|66.249.80.203]] ([[User talk:66.249.80.203|talk]]) 16:13, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
: Indeed, the approach explained in the main article lacks sections on its scope, criticism. Can the approach itself be falsified to show its limits? If this concern is disregarded by the proponents of BDD, they look more like prophets than scientists. --[[User:Ilgiz|ilgiz]] ([[User talk:Ilgiz|talk]]) 09:51, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
==External links section moved from article==
Line 141 ⟶ 131:
And they both have different terms that one should use... Maybe this article should be changed to reflect that.
[[Special:Contributions/2001:8A0:7F0F:3601:899C:15B8:A86A:4242|2001:8A0:7F0F:3601:899C:15B8:A86A:4242]] ([[User talk:2001:8A0:7F0F:3601:899C:15B8:A86A:4242|talk]]) 15:25, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
==Lack of information==
▲I was about to add my humble opinion about this article, but I see from the "Talk" here that many people agree that the article is rather meaningless. Or maybe the subject (BDD) is meaningless and vague. How about "BDD is just having the testers talk to the users..." I need to know what BDD is because I am about to go on a job interview and BDD is one of the requirements. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2601:14d:4101:9d70:59c0:ad7f:6682:537|2601:14d:4101:9d70:59c0:ad7f:6682:537]] ([[User talk:2601:14d:4101:9d70:59c0:ad7f:6682:537#top|talk]]) 13:14, 25 July 2019 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Xsign -->
== "SHE QC" and "The Three Amigos" ==
| |||