Talk:Windows API: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Internet Explorer Integration: {{subst:unsigned}} a comment.
Line 171:
Wrapping requires design intent to replace all consumption need for the underlying tech. For example, MFC and ATL are not intended to replace all consumer need for Windows API.
 
Taking a step back: What is the point of this section? For example, it says MFC uses Windows API. ok. Everything built for Windows uses Windows API. What is interesting about MFC doing that? Goes without saying. Adds no value. What is interesting about MFC WRT WinAPI?
 
Suggest: Either remove this section or atdon't leastsay that thesethe other techs are wrappers -- just list them as other Microsoft Windows tech that the reader might want to peruse. [[User:Stevebroshar|Stevebroshar]] ([[User talk:Stevebroshar|talk]]) 11:54, 29 January 2024 (UTC)