Revision as of 14:09, 21 October 2024 edit ClueBot III (talk \| contribs) Bots 1,473,783 edits m Archiving 1 discussion to Talk:Plum pudding model/Archive 1. (BOT) ← Previous edit		Revision as of 13:57, 24 October 2024 edit undo ClueBot III (talk \| contribs) Bots 1,473,783 edits m Archiving 1 discussion to Talk:Plum pudding model/Archive 1. (BOT) Next edit →
Line 66: ::I have incorporated these references and an additional secondary history ref in a new section called "Significance". [[User:Johnjbarton\|Johnjbarton]] ([[User talk:Johnjbarton\|talk]]) 03:50, 14 July 2024 (UTC) :::@[[User:Kurzon\|Kurzon]] Please stop changing the lead sentence without discussion. It is inappropriate per sources and personally rude in my opinion. [[User:Johnjbarton\|Johnjbarton]] ([[User talk:Johnjbarton\|talk]]) 16:13, 21 July 2024 (UTC) ~~==How is this image incorrectly labelled?==~~ ~~[[File:Alpha particle electron collision.svg\|400px]]~~ ~~Explain. [[User:Kurzon\|Kurzon]] ([[User talk:Kurzon\|talk]]) 18:50, 25 July 2024 (UTC)~~ ~~:The image that was added to the page did not have the electron labeled. [[User:Johnjbarton\|Johnjbarton]] ([[User talk:Johnjbarton\|talk]]) 20:42, 25 July 2024 (UTC)~~ ~~::Well once again there is no edit summary but this time the image is complete. [[User:Johnjbarton\|Johnjbarton]] ([[User talk:Johnjbarton\|talk]]) 21:05, 25 July 2024 (UTC)~~ == Why the Thomson model was(n't) wrong ==

Talk:Plum pudding model: Difference between revisions