Wikipedia:Identifying and using self-published works: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Self-published doesn't mean bad: interim revision per discussion on RSN
Tag: Reverted
see [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Verifiability&diff=prev&oldid=1254780580]
Line 23:
 
Be careful in identifying the publishers of books. In some cases, authors will create a [[Doing business as|trade name]] so that it will look like a separate entity has published their works. If the author directly controls the decision to publish the books, then those books are still self-published. Self-published books may be printed by a [[vanity press]] or a publisher that prints books by only that author.
 
If the author works for a company, and the publisher is the employer, and the author's job is to produce the work (e.g., sales materials or a corporate website), then the author and publisher are the same.
 
The 16th edition of ''[[The Chicago Manual of Style]]'' says, "Any Internet site that does not have a specific publisher or sponsoring body should be treated as unpublished or self-published work." However, the converse isn't true: if a site does have a specific publisher or sponsoring body, it might still be self-published.