Content deleted Content added
I don't find it clearer, the textbooks are about 50/50 on transitive + irreflexive vs. transitive + asymmetric. try a different wording. the proofs are in the cited source and not relevant per MOS:MATH |
→External links: inline commons cat link and establish its relevance; [[de:...] no longer needed |
||
Line 258:
== External links ==
{{Commons category inline|Hasse diagrams}}; each of which shows an example for a partial order
{{refbegin}}
* {{OEIS el|1=A001035|2= Number of posets with ''n'' labeled elements|formalname=Number of partially ordered sets ("posets") with n labeled elements (or labeled acyclic transitive digraphs)}}
Line 269:
[[Category:Order theory]]
[[Category:Binary relations]]
| |||