Content deleted Content added
No edit summary Tags: Reverted possible vandalism |
Leonidlednev (talk | contribs) m Reverted 1 edit by AllyeahIamNicer123w2 (talk) to last revision by Leonidlednev |
||
Line 2:
{{Software development process}}
'''Test-driven development''' ('''TDD''')
Alternative approaches to writing automated tests is to write all of the production code before starting on the test code or to write all of the test code before starting on the production code. With TDD, both are written together, therefore shortening debugging time necessities.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Parsa |first1=Saeed |last2=Zakeri-Nasrabadi |first2=Morteza |last3=Turhan |first3=Burak |date=2025-01-01 |title=Testability-driven development: An improvement to the TDD efficiency |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920548924000461 |journal=Computer Standards & Interfaces |volume=91 |pages=103877 |doi=10.1016/j.csi.2024.103877 |issn=0920-5489}}</ref>
Line 325:
}}</ref>
A high number of passing unit tests may bring a false sense of security, resulting in fewer additional [[software testing]] activities, such as [[integration testing]] and [[compliance testing]].
Line 387:
[[Category:Software development process]]
[[Category:Software testing]]
|