Content deleted Content added
HagermanBot (talk | contribs) m 82.32.240.68 didn't sign: "Language" |
Compare to Standards Based frameworks? |
||
Line 20:
Large sections of this page read like marketting material for Hibernate. It could do with rewritting. <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[Special:Contributions/82.32.240.68|82.32.240.68]] ([[User talk:82.32.240.68|talk]]) 17:33, 21 March 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned -->
== Compare to Standards Based frameworks? ==
Like JPOX.
Quote from JPOX site:
" You can use a proprietary or non-standards compliant persistence framework like TopLink, or Hibernate and persist your plain old Java objects. You will, however, be tied in to their API and be unable to easily move your system to an alternative implementation.
Alternatively you can use JDO, a standardised persistence interface. With JDO you can take your plain old Java objects and just persist them as they are. It is totally transparent and very little work is required by the developer." (http://www.jpox.org/docs/jdo/jdo_why.html)
So, any argument about this?
| |||