Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageRank algorithm in biochemistry: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 11:
'''Keep''' [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22PageRank%22+%22Biochemistry%22&client=safari&sca_esv=2e08a6d3b8f5b541&rls=en&sxsrf=ADLYWIL30TqVtbon-PUYo8aXlvcOM1YA2w%3A1732075800543&ei=GGE9Z-v2INSjur8P1peTkQ4&ved=0ahUKEwjr4sKWheqJAxXUke4BHdbLJOIQ4dUDCA8&uact=5&oq=%22PageRank%22+%22Biochemistry%22&gs_lp=Egxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAiGSJQYWdlUmFuayIgIkJpb2NoZW1pc3RyeSIyBRAhGKABMgUQIRigATIFECEYoAEyBRAhGKABMgUQIRigAUjrQFDQBFiBPnABeAGQAQCYAe0FoAHvR6oBBjUtMTMuMbgBA8gBAPgBAZgCD6ACp0jCAgoQABiwAxjWBBhHwgIOEAAYgAQYkQIYsQMYigXCAgsQABiABBiRAhiKBcICChAAGIAEGEMYigXCAgUQABiABMICBhAAGBYYHsICCxAAGIAEGIYDGIoFwgIIEAAYgAQYogSYAwCIBgGQBgiSBwYxLjUtMTSgB8Ut&sclient=gws-wiz-serp A basic google search] has a large number of scholarly publications on the applications of the PageRank algorithm that are specific to biochemistry. It clearly is a topic that passes [[WP:SIGCOV]]. Any issues of redundancy or poor explanation can be solved through editing, but I definitely think that it is a reasonable [[WP:Content fork]] in this instance.[[User:4meter4|4meter4]] ([[User talk:4meter4|talk]]) 04:14, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
'''Delete''' per TNT anyway. Most of the references don't refer to PageRank or are deceased. The article as it stands is a barely-comprehensible summary of a single, very narrow application within biochemistry, and doesn't fulfill the promise of its title. It's possible someone could write an article based on 4meter4's search, but they'd have to start from scratch and almost nothing in the existing article would be of any use to them. This is a classic example of the Wikipedia articlee driven by someone's understandable excitement about a single primary literature reference. [[User:Elemimele|Elemimele]] ([[User talk:Elemimele|talk]]) 10:15, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
| |||