Talk:Plum pudding model: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
ClueBot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 1 discussion to Talk:Plum pudding model/Archive 1. (BOT)
ClueBot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 1 discussion to Talk:Plum pudding model/Archive 1. (BOT)
Line 66:
::I have incorporated these references and an additional secondary history ref in a new section called "Significance". [[User:Johnjbarton|Johnjbarton]] ([[User talk:Johnjbarton|talk]]) 03:50, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
:::@[[User:Kurzon|Kurzon]] Please stop changing the lead sentence without discussion. It is inappropriate per sources and personally rude in my opinion. [[User:Johnjbarton|Johnjbarton]] ([[User talk:Johnjbarton|talk]]) 16:13, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
 
== Adding Crowther's experimental results. ==
 
The section on the 1910 paper would be better if Crowther's results were summarized. That would help clarify that Thomson's model seemed to work until the Geiger-Marsden experiment results became known. [[User:Johnjbarton|Johnjbarton]] ([[User talk:Johnjbarton|talk]]) 00:00, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
 
:I added one paragraph about one set of Crowther experiments. [[User:Johnjbarton|Johnjbarton]] ([[User talk:Johnjbarton|talk]]) 00:33, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
 
==Deflection by the electrons==