Revision as of 15:15, 7 August 2003 edit Doradus (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 6,033 edits mNo edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:10, 7 August 2003 edit undo Stan Shebs (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 42,777 edits cond is fundamental Next edit →
Line 62: :::Forgive my notation, but True can be defined as "\ x . x" and False as "\ x ." where "\" is lambda. Then cond would be unnecessary because True and False would take care of it. Of course, if you're using eager evaluation, this isn't quite true, because "(False foo)" will still evaluate foo (which doesn't matter if it's referentially transparent).[[User:P3d0\|P3d0]] 15:15, 7 Aug 2003 (UTC) ::::It wouldn't be Lisp anymore then; "cond" is the fundamental conditional construct shared by all Lisp versions. [[User:Stan Shebs\|Stan]] 16:10, 7 Aug 2003 (UTC)

Talk:Lisp (programming language): Difference between revisions