Small-angle approximation: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
I don't think it's necessary to directly include the title in the first sentence here, per MOS:BOLDAVOID
Line 61:
\end{align}</math>
 
where {{tmath|\theta}} is the angle in radians. For very small angles, higher powers of {{tmath|\theta}} become extremely small, for instance if {{tmath|1= \theta = 0.01}}, then {{tmath|1= \theta^3 = 0.000\,001}}, just one ten-thousandth of {{tmath|\theta}}. Thus for many purposes it is safesuffices to drop the cubic and higher terms and approximate the sine and tangent of a small angle using the radian measure of the angle, {{tmath|\sin\theta \approx \tan\theta \approx \theta}}, and drop the quadratic term and approximate the cosine as {{tmath|\cos\theta \approx 1}}.
 
If additional precision is needed the quadratic and cubic terms can also be included,
<math display=block>{{tmath|\sin\theta \approx \tan\theta - \approx tfrac16\theta.</math>^3}},
 
<math display=block>{{tmath|\cos\theta \approx 1 - \tfrac12\theta^2.</math>}}, and
The cosine of a sufficiently small angle is very nearly {{tmath|1}}, which sometimes suffices as an approximation. Where more precision is needed the quadratic term can also included, and cosine can be approximated as
{{tmath|\tan\theta \approx \theta + \tfrac13\theta^3}}.
 
<math display=block>\cos\theta \approx 1 - \tfrac12\theta^2.</math>
 
==== Dual numbers ====