Comparison of instant messaging protocols: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m Reverted 1 edit by 78.190.203.125 (talk) to last revision by 2003:E3:F19:F23:3CB6:18BA:92CE:10B2
Thx56 (talk | contribs)
m Table of instant messaging protocols: Capitalization correction
Line 237:
| {{yes2|Yes, via IRCv3<ref>{{cite web |title=chathistory Extension |url=https://ircv3.net/specs/extensions/chathistory |website=ircv3.net |access-date=25 February 2023}}</ref> or MemoServ that differs from the main system}}
| {{optional}}
| {{lost|manyMany implementations which are mostly non-interoperable with other IRC clients}}<ref>{{cite web |last1=Gioia |first1=Antonio |title=IRC with SSL and OTR encryption |url=https://www.antoniogioia.com/irc-with-ssl-and-otr/ |access-date=28 December 2023}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Secure encryption layer for the IRC protocol based on OpenPGP. |url=https://weechat.org/scripts/source/ircrypt.py.html/}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=encrypted DCC - SDCC - SCHAT |url=https://forums.mirc.com/ubbthreads.php/topics/234584/encrypted-dcc-sdcc-schat}}</ref>
| {{No}}{{efn|name=fn_3|Scalability issue: The protocol gets increasingly inefficient with the number of contacts.{{#tag:ref|{{IETF RFC|1324}}, D. Reed, 1992. 2.5.1, Size}}{{#tag:ref|[http://www.psyc.eu/synconf Functionality provided by systems for synchronous conferencing], C.v. Loesch, 1992. 1.2.1 Growth}}}}
| {{No}}