Noether's theorem: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Move ref def to History section and reword. Noether's work specifically on the invariance theorem was in 1918
Brief illustration and overview of the concept: Insert missing sums over r in display formula on \Delta S; improve explanation of this equation.
Line 62:
| When there are time transformations <math>t \mapsto t + T</math>, they cause the "buffering" segments to contribute the two following terms to <math>\Delta S</math>:
<math display="block">\Delta S \approx
\pm \left(TL + \int \sum_r \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}_r}\Delta \dot{q}_r\right) \approx
\pm T \left(L - \sum_r \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}_r}\dot{q}_r\right),.
</math>
The first term beingis due to stretching in temporal dimension of the "buffering" segment. (thatThe first segment changes theits size offrom <math>\tau</math> to <math>\tau + T</math>, and the ___domainsecond ofsegment integration)form <math>\tau</math> to <math>\tau - T</math>. Therefore, the integral over the first segment changes by <math> +T L(t_0)</math> and the integral over the second segment changes by <math> -T L(t_1)</math>. The second term is due to itsthe "slanting"time justdilation asby a factor <math>(\tau+T)/\tau</math> in the exemplarfirst casesegment and by <math>(\tau-T)/\tau</math> in the second segment. Assuming <math>T \ll \tau </math>, these time dilations change <math>\dot{q}_r</math> to <math>\dot{q}_r \mp (T/\tau) \dot{q}_r</math> in the first and second segment, respectively. Together they add to the consered quantity (the action S) a summand <math display="inline"> \pm T \left(L - \sum_r \left(\partial L/\partial \dot{q}_r\right)\dot{q}_r\right)</math> tofor the conservedfirst quantity(+) and second (-) segment.
| Finally, when instead of a trajectory <math>q(t)</math> entire fields <math>\psi(q_r,t)</math> are considered, the argument replaces
* the interval <math>[t_0,t_1]</math> with a bounded region <math>U</math> of the <math>(q_r,t)</math>-___domain,