XML database: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Grammar; uncessary use of paranthesis. Also, the term "converiosn costs" needs at least an explanatio, or an appropriate link to an explanation. Thus I ask for a citation. In terms of the "citation" appeal [?]; If there is a better way to stating that more information needs to be included (in term of the "conversion costs" term, then (of course) please let me know.
No edit summary
Line 14:
* Provides a solution for [[Object-relational impedance mismatch]]<ref>[NoSQL Distilled: A Brief Guide to the Emerging World of Polyglot Persistence. Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc, 2009] {{ISBN|978-0321826626}}</ref>
 
Steve O'Connell gives one reason for the use of XML in databases: the increasingly common use of XML for [[transport layer|data transport]], which has meant that "data is extracted from databases and put into XML documents and vice-versa".<ref name=oconnell2005>{{cite report|author=O'Connell, Steve|work=Advanced Databases Course Notes|title=Section 9.2|type=Syllabus|date=2005|publisher=[[University of Southampton]]|___location=Southampton, England}}</ref>{{update inline|date=March 2015}} It may prove more efficient in terms of conversion costs [citation]{{Citation needed}}, and easier to store the data in XML format. In content-based applications, the ability of the native XML database also minimizes the need for extraction or entry of metadata to support searching and navigation.
 
== XML-enabled databases ==