Content deleted Content added
m Replaced 2 bare URLs by {{Cite web}}; Replaced "Archived copy" by actual titles |
GreenC bot (talk | contribs) Rescued 1 archive link; reformat 1 link. Wayback Medic 2.5 per Category:All articles with dead external links |
||
Line 13:
Over the years, the notion of general purpose multi-party protocols became a fertile area to investigate basic and general protocol issues properties on, such as [[universal composability]] or [[Adversary (cryptography)|mobile adversary]] as in [[proactive secret sharing]].<ref>Rafail Ostrovsky, Moti Yung: How to Withstand Mobile Virus Attacks. PODC 1991. pp. 51-59 [http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=112600.112605]</ref>
Since the late 2000s, and certainly since 2010 and on, the ___domain of general purpose protocols has moved to deal with efficiency improvements of the protocols with practical applications in mind. Increasingly efficient protocols for MPC have been proposed, and MPC can be now considered as a practical solution to various real-life problems (especially ones that only require linear sharing of the secrets and mainly local operations on the shares with not much interactions among the parties), such as distributed voting, private bidding and auctions, sharing of signature or decryption functions and [[private information retrieval]].<ref>Claudio Orlandi: [https://web.archive.org/web/20141016035557/http://u.cs.biu.ac.il/~orlandi/icassp-draft.pdf Is multiparty computation any good in practice?]
in<ref>Moti Yung: From Mental Poker to Core Business: Why and How to Deploy Secure Computation Protocols? ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security 2015: 1-2
https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2810103.2812701</ref>).
| |||