Content deleted Content added
→Big ole whitelist request: you've done nothing wrong: investigating |
→Big ole whitelist request: this whitelist doesn't affect {{Harvc}}. I would just set ignore_err=yes for now. |
||
Line 61:
::Thank you, {{u|hike395}}! (a road I've not exactly hiked from, but definitely camped near){{Pb}}In [[Special:Diff/1271758480]] I undid the manual {{para|ref}} I added to counteract the previously incorrect whitelist CITEREFs, but my {{tl|harvc}}s are still throwing {{red|no target}} errors. Are you able to tell what I'm doing wrong? [[User:Folly Mox|Folly Mox]] ([[User talk:Folly Mox|talk]]) 15:34, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
:::You've done nothing wrong: there's some other problem. I'm investigating. (Camping on the Sierra side of US395 can be delightful, also; some people like the solitude of the Great Basin, though). — [[User:Hike395|hike395]] ([[User talk:Hike395|talk]]) 16:20, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
::::{{ping|Folly Mox}} The problem is in [[Module:Harvc]]. It doesn't use the whitelist/wrapper mechanism in this module. For now, I would set {{para|ignore_err|yes}} in {{tl|Harvc}} to suppress the spurious errors. I'll think about whether we can use the mechanism here over there. — [[User:Hike395|hike395]] ([[User talk:Hike395|talk]]) 18:36, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
== Making whitelisting simpler and more efficient ==
| |||