Revision as of 06:00, 27 June 2024 edit David Eppstein (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 235,695 edits it's a programming language; why are these other projects relevant? ← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:52, 27 January 2025 edit undo Kittybwained (talk \| contribs) 64 edits →Reads like advertising: Reply Tag: Reply Next edit →
Line 107: What it says. Sorry, but it does. [[Special:Contributions/2601:1C0:5401:2040:5CCB:C27C:F135:5733\|2601:1C0:5401:2040:5CCB:C27C:F135:5733]] ([[User talk:2601:1C0:5401:2040:5CCB:C27C:F135:5733\|talk]]) 04:12, 5 September 2023 (UTC) :Yeah, I mostly just glanced at the article but the sentence "Julia programs can also be (separately) compiled to binary executables, even allowing no-source-code distribution, and the executables can get much smaller with Julia 1.12." stuck out to me. Do we really need to list that 1.12 can produce smaller executables? That reads more like an ad than something belonging in an encyclopedia. [[User:Kittybwained\|Kittybwained]] ([[User talk:Kittybwained\|talk]]) 00:52, 27 January 2025 (UTC) == Where it can run table (compatability) ==

Talk:Julia (programming language): Difference between revisions