Linear parameter-varying control: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
Alter: title, url. URLs might have been anonymized. Add: doi-access, bibcode, authors 1-1. Removed URL that duplicated identifier. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by GoingBatty | Category:CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI | #UCB_Category 4/17
OAbot (talk | contribs)
m Open access bot: arxiv updated in citation with #oabot.
Line 14:
* It is also important that the selected scheduling variables reflect changes in plant dynamics as operating conditions change. It is possible in gain scheduling to incorporate linear [[robust control]] methodologies into nonlinear control design; however the global stability, robustness and performance properties are not addressed explicitly in the design process.
 
Though the approach is simple and the computational burden of linearization scheduling approaches is often much less than for other nonlinear design approaches, its inherent drawbacks sometimes outweigh its advantages and necessitates a new paradigm for the control of dynamical systems. New methodologies such as Adaptive control based on [[Artificial neural networks|Artificial Neural Networks]] (ANN), [[Fuzzy logic]], [[Reinforcement learning|Reinforcement Learning]],<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Hosseini |first1=Ehsan |last2=Aghadavoodi |first2=Ehsan |last3=Fernández Ramírez |first3=Luis M. |date=September 2020 |title=Improving response of wind turbines by pitch angle controller based on gain-scheduled recurrent ANFIS type 2 with passive reinforcement learning |url=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0960148120307588 |journal=Renewable Energy |language=en |volume=157 |pages=897–910 |doi=10.1016/j.renene.2020.05.060|bibcode=2020REne..157..897H }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Yeh |first1=Yi-Liang |last2=Yang |first2=Po-Kai |date=2021-11-26 |title=Design and Comparison of Reinforcement-Learning-Based Time-Varying PID Controllers with Gain-Scheduled Actions |journal=Machines |language=en |volume=9 |issue=12 |pages=319 |doi=10.3390/machines9120319 |doi-access=free |issn=2075-1702}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Gutiérrez-Oribio |first1=Diego |last2=Stathas |first2=Alexandros |last3=Stefanou |first3=Ioannis |date=2024-12-17 |title=AI-Driven Approach for Sustainable Extraction of Earth's Subsurface Renewable Energy While Minimizing Seismic Activity |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nag.3923 |journal=International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics |language=en |doi=10.1002/nag.3923 |issn=0363-9061|arxiv=2408.03664 }}</ref> etc. try to address such problems, the lack of proof of stability and performance of such approaches over entire operating parameter regime requires design of a parameter dependent controller with guaranteed properties for which, a Linear Parameter Varying controller could be an ideal candidate.
 
==Linear parameter-varying systems==