|
* <nowiki>[[2022–2023 Russian strikes against Ukrainian infrastructure#2022|was hit]]</nowiki> The anchor (#2022) is no longer available because it was [[Special:Diff/1158014598|deleted by a user]] before. <!-- {"title":"2022","appear":{"revid":1131094548,"parentid":1131090923,"timestamp":"2023-01-02T14:46:06Z","removed_section_titles":["October 2022","November 2022","December 2022","January 2023","January 1st"],"added_section_titles":["2022","2023","1 January"]},"disappear":{"revid":1158014598,"parentid":1157872015,"timestamp":"2023-06-01T12:31:29Z","removed_section_titles":["2022","October","November","December","2023","January","February","March","April","May"],"added_section_titles":["Timeline","October 2022","November 2022","December 2022","January 2023","February 2023","March 2023","April 2023","May 2023"]}} -->
}}
== Split proposed ==
The history section of this article is [[WP:LENGTH|long]] enough to merit its own article. See also German-language article: [[de:Geschichte der Stadt Dnipro|History of Dnipro (city)]]. Thoughts? -- [[User:M2545|M2545]] ([[User talk:M2545|talk]]) 10:27, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
:{{ping|M2545}} I took out the political stuff (election results and famous politicians who were involved in national politics etc.) from the history section of this article the last days and placed this in [[Dnipro#Politics]]. I did this because looking at the Wikipedia articles [[History of London]] and [[History of Berlin]] this kind of information does not belong in the history section of a Wikipedia article about a city... Is in your opinion the history section of this article still [[WP:LENGTH|long]] enough to merit its own article? I am afraid not, and is afraid that a [[History of Dnipro]]· will be nothing but only a slightly longer version then the history section of this article. — '''[[User:Yulia Romero|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:orange">Yulia Romero</span>]]''' • [[User_talk:Yulia Romero|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:blue">Talk to me!</span>]] 21:02, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
::<nowiki>I agree. unless there is to be substantial new material there is no cause for a separate history page.~~~</nowiki> [[User:ManfredHugh|ManfredHugh]] ([[User talk:ManfredHugh|talk]]) 09:18, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
{{ping|M2545}} & {{ping|ManfredHugh}} I have expanded the history section in the weeks since last 30 August.... So it is longer now... I still think that it is not long enough for a separate article, but it is actually possible now to do it. And to be honest, I do not want to invest my time in a separate [[History of Dnipro]] English language Wikipedia article (because I will not learn any new things about one of my favourite cities while doing it). — '''[[User:Yulia Romero|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:orange">Yulia Romero</span>]]''' • [[User_talk:Yulia Romero|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:blue">Talk to me!</span>]] 19:50, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
* '''Oppose''' while the article is on the longer side (a little over 10000 words of readable prose), its not enough to justify an article split. Probs best to just do some condensing and cleanup and the article will be fine. Cheers, [[User:Dantheanimator|Dan]] [[User talk:Dantheanimator|the]] [[Special:Contributions/Dantheanimator|Animator]] 05:42, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 25 November 2024 ==
|
