Durand–Kerner method: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Changing short description from "Root-finding algorithm for solving polynomial equations" to "Root-finding algorithm for polynomials"
Line 14:
: <math>f(x) = x^4 + ax^3 + bx^2 + cx + d</math>
 
for all ''x''. The known numbers ''a'', ''b'', ''c'', ''d'' are the [[coefficient]]s.
for all ''x''.
 
TheLet knownthe (potentially complex) numbers ''aP'', ''bQ'', ''cR'', ''dS'' arebe the [[coefficient]]sroots of this polynomial ''f''. Then
 
Let the (potentially complex) numbers ''P'', ''Q'', ''R'', ''S'' be the roots of this polynomial ''f''.
 
Then
 
: <math>f(x) = (x - P)(x - Q)(x - R)(x - S)</math>
Line 30 ⟶ 26:
So if used as a [[fixed point (mathematics)|fixed-point]] [[iteration]]
: <math>x_1 := x_0 - \frac{f(x_0)}{(x_0 - Q)(x_0 - R)(x_0 - S)},</math>
it is strongly stable in that every initial point ''x''<sub>0</sub> ≠ ''Q'', ''R'', ''S'' delivers after one iteration the root ''P'' = ''x''<sub>1</sub>. Furthermore, if one replaces the zeros ''Q'', ''R'' and ''S'' by approximations ''q'' ≈ ''Q'', ''r'' ≈ ''R'', ''s'' ≈ ''S'', such that ''q'', ''r'', ''s'' are not equal to ''P'', then ''P'' is still a fixed point of the perturbed fixed-point iteration
delivers after one iteration the root ''P'' = ''x''<sub>1</sub>.
 
Furthermore, if one replaces the zeros ''Q'', ''R'' and ''S''
by approximations ''q'' ≈ ''Q'', ''r'' ≈ ''R'', ''s'' ≈ ''S'',
such that ''q'', ''r'', ''s'' are not equal to ''P'', then ''P''
is still a fixed point of the perturbed fixed-point iteration
 
: <math>x_{k+1} := x_k - \frac{f(x_k)}{(x_k - q)(x_k - r)(x_k - s)},</math>
Line 43 ⟶ 33:
: <math>P - \frac{f(P)}{(P - q)(P - r)(P - s)} = P - 0 = P.</math>
 
Note that the denominator is still different from zero. This fixed-point iteration is a [[contraction mapping]] for ''x'' around ''P''.
This fixed-point iteration is a [[contraction mapping]]
for ''x'' around ''P''.
 
The clue to the method now is to combine the fixed-point iteration for ''P'' with similar iterations for ''Q'', ''R'', ''S'' into a simultaneous iteration for all roots.
the fixed-point iteration for ''P'' with similar iterations
for ''Q'', ''R'', ''S'' into a simultaneous iteration for all roots.
 
Initialize ''p'', ''q'', ''r'', ''s'':
Line 66 ⟶ 52:
: <math>s_n = s_{n-1} - \frac{f(s_{n-1})}{(s_{n-1} - p_n)(s_{n-1} - q_n)(s_{n-1} - r_n)}.</math>
 
Re-iterate until the numbers ''p'', ''q'', ''r'', ''s'' essentially stop changing relative to the desired precision. They then have the values ''P'', ''Q'', ''R'', ''S'' in some order and in the chosen precision. So the problem is solved.
essentially stop changing relative to the desired precision.
They then have the values ''P'', ''Q'', ''R'', ''S'' in some order
and in the chosen precision. So the problem is solved.
 
Note that [[complex number]] arithmetic must be used, and that the roots are found simultaneously rather than one at a time.
and that the roots are found simultaneously rather than one at a time.
 
== Variations ==
This iteration procedure, like the [[Gauss–Seidel method]] for linear equations, computes one number at a time based on the already computed numbers. A variant of this procedure, like the [[Jacobi method]], computes a vector of root approximations at a time. Both variants are effective root-finding algorithms.
computes one number at a time based on the already computed numbers.
A variant of this procedure, like the [[Jacobi method]],
computes a vector of root approximations at a time.
Both variants are effective root-finding algorithms.
 
One could also choose the initial values for ''p'', ''q'', ''r'', ''s'' by some other procedure, even randomly, but in a way that
by some other procedure, even randomly, but in a way that
* they are inside some not-too-large circle containing also the roots of ''f''(''x''), e.g. the circle around the origin with radius <math>1 + \max\big(|a|, |b|, |c|, |d|\big)</math>, (where 1, ''a'', ''b'', ''c'', ''d'' are the coefficients of ''f''(''x''))
and that
* they are not too close to each other,
which may increasingly become a concern as the degree of the polynomial increases.
as the degree of the polynomial increases.
 
If the coefficients are real and the polynomial has odd degree, then it must have at least one real root. To find this, use a real value of ''p''<sub>0</sub> as the initial guess and make ''q''<sub>0</sub> and ''r''<sub>0</sub>, etc., [[complex conjugate]] pairs. Then the iteration will preserve these properties; that is, ''p''<sub>''n''</sub> will always be real, and ''q''<sub>''n''</sub> and ''r''<sub>''n''</sub>, etc., will always be conjugate. In this way, the ''p''<sub>''n''</sub> will converge to a real root ''P''. Alternatively, make all of the initial guesses real; they will remain so.
Line 183 ⟶ 159:
In the [[quotient ring]] (algebra) of [[residue class]]es modulo &fnof;(''X''), the multiplication by ''X'' defines an [[endomorphism]] that has the zeros of &fnof;(''X'') as [[eigenvalue]]s with the corresponding multiplicities. Choosing a basis, the multiplication operator is represented by its coefficient matrix ''A'', the [[companion matrix]] of &fnof;(''X'') for this basis.
 
Since every polynomial can be reduced modulo &fnof;(''X'') to a polynomial of degree ''n''&nbsp;&minus;&nbsp;1 or lower, the space of residue classes can be identified with the space of polynomials of degree bounded by ''n''&nbsp;&minus;&nbsp;1. A problem-specific basis can be taken from [[Lagrange interpolation]] as the set of ''n'' polynomials
A problem specific basis can be taken from [[Lagrange interpolation]] as the set of ''n'' polynomials
 
:<math>b_k(X)=\prod_{1\le j\le n,\;j\ne k}(X-z_j),\quad k=1,\dots,n,</math>
Line 220 ⟶ 195:
: <math>\max_{1 \le k \le n} |w_k| \le \frac{1}{5n} \min_{1 \le j < k \le n} |z_k - z_j|,</math>
 
then this inequality also holds for all iterates, all inclusion disks <math>D\big(z_k + w_k, (n - 1) |w_k|\big)</math> are disjoint, and linear convergence with a contraction factor of 1/2 holds. Further, the inclusion disks can in this case be chosen as
are disjoint, and linear convergence with a contraction factor of 1/2 holds. Further, the inclusion disks can in this case be chosen as
 
: <math>D\left(z_k + w_k, \tfrac14 |w_k|\right),\quad k = 1, \dots, n,</math>