Content deleted Content added
→JTWC 1 min winds: Reply |
Jason Rees (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 85:
::::You can argue that they were tropical depressions because of the tracking data provided by NRL etc but without a formal advisory or designation from the JTWC or the NWS stating such, we enter the territory of original research because of the way the infobox works. [[User:Jason Rees|Jason Rees]] ([[User talk:Jason Rees|talk]]) 22:59, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
:::::@[[User:Jason Rees|Jason Rees]]: I see why this would be a valid argument, and I will accept this conclusion. Two last things to note; 1. where is the peak intensity found on numbered systems provided by JTWC so that it would not be considered original research?; and 2. Wouldn't comparing numbers from the track data to find the highest wind speed count as [[WP:CALC]]? Just curious. <span style="border-radius:9pt;border:solid 2px #0f0;padding:1px;background-color:#156">[[User:2003 LN6|<span style="color:#fff">2003</span>]] [[User:2003LN6/t|<span style="color:#fff">LN</span>]][[User:2003LN6/c|<span style="color:#fff">6</span>]]</span> 00:24, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
:::::::The point was that on numbered systems, we are not classifying the system as a tropical cyclone or x, but on unnumbered systems, we would be, which is why we enter the realms of OR. Comparing the numbers from the tracking data for numbered systems does indeed fall under WP:Calc, but we can also look at various resources such as the JTWC ATCR's & BT files.[[User:Jason Rees|Jason Rees]] ([[User talk:Jason Rees|talk]]) 00:40, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
| |||