Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
congruence with body of article (correcting my error)
It's more than "suggest", but while a substantial majority of systematic reviews indicate efficacy, the conclusions are not universal, so I added the adverb, "generally," to more accurately reflect the state of the science.
Line 9:
EMDR is recommended for the treatment of PTSD by various government and medical bodies citing varying levels of evidence, including the World Health Organization, the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, and the US Departments of Veteran Affairs and Defense. The American Psychological Association does not endorse EMDR as a first-line treatment, but indicates that it is probably effective for treating adult PTSD.
 
Systematic analyses published since 2013 suggestgenerally indicate that EMDR treatment efficacy for adults with PTSD is equivalent to trauma-focused cognitive and behavioral therapies (TF-CBT), such as [[Prolonged exposure therapy]] (PE) and [[Cognitive Processing Therapy]] (CPT). However, bilateral stimulation does not contribute substantially, if at all, to treatment effectiveness. The predominant therapeutic factors in EMDR and TF-CBT are [[Exposure therapy|exposure]] and various components of [[cognitive-behavioral therapy]].
 
Because eye movements and other bilateral stimulation techniques do not uniquely contribute to EMDR treatment efficacy, EMDR has been characterized as a [[purple hat therapy]], i.e., its effectiveness is due to the same therapeutic methods found in other evidence-based psychotherapies for PTSD, namely exposure therapy and CBT techniques, without any contribution from its distinctive add-ons.