Revision as of 00:33, 26 September 2024 edit WhatamIdoing (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 128,515 edits →Tertiary sources in legal studies: new section Tag: New topic ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:08, 14 February 2025 edit undo Traumnovelle (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 11,776 edits →' Sometimes, a primary source is even the best possible source': new section Tag: New topic Next edit →
Line 218: [[User:WhatamIdoing\|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing\|talk]]) 00:33, 26 September 2024 (UTC) == ' Sometimes, a primary source is even the best possible source' == [[WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD]] states 'Sometimes, a primary source is even the best possible source', goes against other policies such as OR and NPOV. Secondary sources are required to establish importance and justify inclusion. [[User:Traumnovelle\|Traumnovelle]] ([[User talk:Traumnovelle\|talk]]) 23:08, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Identifying and using primary sources: Difference between revisions