Revision as of 21:19, 15 February 2025 edit Blueboar (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 53,897 edits →' Sometimes, a primary source is even the best possible source': Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:22, 15 February 2025 edit undo Traumnovelle (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 11,791 edits →' Sometimes, a primary source is even the best possible source': Reply Tag: Reply Next edit →
Line 232: ::::And this guideline is frequently cited in situations where secondary sources have not been provided. [[User:Traumnovelle\|Traumnovelle]] ([[User talk:Traumnovelle\|talk]]) 20:16, 15 February 2025 (UTC) :::::Um… this isn’t a guideline. It’s an explanatory essay. [[User:Blueboar\|Blueboar]] ([[User talk:Blueboar\|talk]]) 21:19, 15 February 2025 (UTC) ::::::Well, I guess that changes a lot. Apologies for ignoring the banner at the top. [[User:Traumnovelle\|Traumnovelle]] ([[User talk:Traumnovelle\|talk]]) 21:22, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Identifying and using primary sources: Difference between revisions