Content deleted Content added
Jason Rees (talk | contribs) →JTWC 1 min winds: Reply |
→JTWC 1 min winds: Reply |
||
Line 75:
::::::::::@[[User:Jason Rees|Jason Rees]]: There have been three systems in the South Pacific designated as tropical depressions by the JTWC on the track maps, but not by the FMS as disturbances. Can I place them under the other systems section? They are 98P, 90P, and 91P. <span style="border-radius:9pt;border:solid 2px #0f0;padding:1px;background-color:#156">[[User:2003 LN6|<span style="color:#fff">2003</span>]] [[User:2003LN6/t|<span style="color:#fff">LN</span>]][[User:2003LN6/c|<span style="color:#fff">6</span>]]</span> 15:25, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::::No because the JTWC have not issued any advisories on these systems or called them Tropical Depressions publicly - you are assuming that they are tropical depressions based on the automated tropical cyclone forecast system which says that they are tropical depressions because they have 25/30 kts winds. Over the years, the rule has been we only mark a system as being a TD or a TS when the JTWC has initiated advisories on it. [[User:Jason Rees|Jason Rees]] ([[User talk:Jason Rees|talk]]) 01:03, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
::::::::::::@[[User:Jason Rees|Jason Rees]]: I understand the reasoning, and I will not add the three systems in the future. One last point to note: This leads to an interesting scenario where the track maps have TD status while they do not even get a mention on the article. I have not ever witnessed this before, nor do I believe I will encounter it again at least in a few years. Usually, even the weakest systems get a Disturbance and numeric designation by the FMS, but apparently not this one. <span style="border-radius:9pt;border:solid 2px #0f0;padding:1px;background-color:#156">[[User:2003 LN6|<span style="color:#fff">2003</span>]] [[User:2003LN6/t|<span style="color:#fff">LN</span>]][[User:2003LN6/c|<span style="color:#fff">6</span>]]</span> 07:07, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
| |||