Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Display:none exploit: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→[[Display:none exploit]]: Delete |
|||
Line 4:
no reference for 2 years. can't find a page from google about this exploit. i think that search engines are smart enough to ignore invisible elements. one more point is that if html isn't converted, why doesn't the user just post javascript? [[User:Fiveship|Fiveship]] 09:57, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' no credible evidence that this is encyclopaedic. <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]</b> <small>([[User:JzG/help|Help!]])</small> 11:11, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. This is not a vulnerability/attack. What's next? The img "exploit" that allows websites to display goatse to its visitors? :) --- [[User:RockMFR|RockMFR]] 14:55, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
|