Unity of science: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 15:40, 23 February 2025

Revision as of 20:10, 23 February 2025

Line 1:

{{Short description|Theory in the philosophy of science}}

The '''unity of science''' is a thesis in [[philosophy of science]] that says that all the [[sciences]] form a unified whole. The variants of the thesis can be classified as [[ontological]] (giving a unified account of the structure of reality) and/or as [[epistemic]]/pragmatic (giving a unified account of how the activities and products of science work).{{sfn|Tahko|2021|p=4}} There are also philosophers such as [[John Dupré]]<ref name=" Dupré ">{{cite book | vauthors=((Dupré, J.)) | date=1 January 1993 | title=The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science | publisher=Harvard University Press | edition=First | isbn=978-0-674-21260-2}}</ref>, [[Nancy Cartwright]],<ref name=" Cartwright ">{{cite book | vauthors=((Cartwright, N.)) | date= 1999 | title=The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science | publisher=Cambridge University Press | url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/dappled-world/86851744699530B9C4F2A19E8A610331 | doi=10.1017/CBO9781139167093 | isbn=978-0-521-64336-8}}</ref> and [[Evelyn Fox Keller]]<ref name="Book">{{cite book | vauthors=((Keller, E. F.)) | date=31 May 2002 | title=Making Sense of Life: Explaining Biological Development with Models, Metaphors, and Machines | publisher=Harvard University Press | edition=1st | isbn=978-0-674-00746-8}}</ref> who emphasize the '''disunity of science''', which does not necessarily imply that there could be no unity in some sense but does emphasize [[Pluralism (philosophy)|pluralism]] in the ontology and/or practice of science.{{sfn|Tahko|2021|p=4}}

Early versions of the unity of science thesis can be found in [[ancient Greek philosophers]] such as [[Aristotle]],{{sfn|Cat|2017}}{{sfn|Wilson|2000}} and in the later history of [[Western philosophy]].{{sfn|Cat|2017}} For example, in the first half of the 20th century the thesis was associated with the unity of science movement led by [[Otto Neurath]],{{sfn|Symons|Pombo|Torres|2011}} and in the second half of the century the thesis was advocated by [[Ludwig von Bertalanffy]] in "General System Theory: A New Approach to Unity of Science" (1951){{sfn|Symons|Pombo|Torres|2011}}{{sfn|Bertalanffy|1951}} and by [[Paul Oppenheim]] and [[Hilary Putnam]] in "Unity of Science as a Working Hypothesis" (1958).{{sfn|Cat|2017}}{{sfn|Oppenheim|Putnam|1958}} It has been opposed by, for example, [[Jerry Fodor]] in "Special Sciences (Or: The Disunity of Science as a Working Hypothesis)" (1974),{{sfn|Cat|2017}}{{sfn|Fodor|1974}} by [[Paul Feyerabend]] in ''Against Method'' (1975) and later works,{{sfn|Cat|2017}}<ref>{{harvnb|Feyerabend|1993}}; {{sfnharvnb|Feyerabend|2011}} and</ref> by [[John Dupré]] in "The Disunity of Science" (1983){{sfn|Dupré|1983}} and ''The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science'' (1993).,{{sfn|Cat|2017}}<ref>{{harvnb|Dupré|1983}}; {{harvnb|Dupré|1993}}</ref> by [[Nancy Cartwright (philosopher)|Nancy Cartwright]] in ''The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science'' (1999) and other works,{{sfn|Cat|2017}}{{sfn|Cartwright|1999}} and by [[Evelyn Fox Keller]] in ''Making Sense of Life: Explaining Biological Development with Models, Metaphors, and Machines'' (2002) and other works.<ref>{{harvnb|Ludwig|Ruphy|2021}}; {{harvnb|Keller|2002}}.</ref>

[[Jean Piaget]] suggested, in his 1918 book ''Recherche''{{sfn|Piaget|1918}} and later works, that the unity of science can be considered in terms of a circle of the sciences, where logic is the foundation for mathematics, which is the foundation for mechanics and physics, and physics is the foundation for chemistry, which is the foundation for biology, which is the foundation for sociology, the moral sciences, psychology, and the theory of knowledge, and the theory of knowledge forms a basis for logic, completing the circle,{{sfn|Braun|Baribeau|1984}} without implying that any science could be [[Reductionism|reduced]] to any other.{{sfn|Kitchener|1981}}

Line 11:

* [[International Encyclopedia of Unified Science]]

* [[Logical positivism]]

* [[Scientific pluralism]]

* [[Special sciences]]

* [[Stanford School]]

Line 27 ⟶ 28:

* {{cite book |editor1-last=Boyd |editor1-first=Richard |editor1-link=Richard Boyd |editor2-last=Gasper |editor2-first=Philip |editor3-last=Trout |editor3-first=J. D. |editor3-link=J. D. Trout |date=1991 |title=The philosophy of science |series=A Bradford book |___location=Cambridge, MA |publisher=[[MIT Press]] |isbn=0262023156 |oclc=22597466 |url=https://archive.org/details/philosophyofscie0000unse_u7z8 |url-access=registration}}

* {{cite journal |last1=Braun |first1=Claude M. J. |last2=Baribeau |first2=Jacinthe M. C. |date=Summer 1984 |title=The classification of psychology among the sciences from Francis Bacon to Boniface Kedrov |journal=[[Journal of Mind and Behavior]] |volume=5 |issue=3 |pages=245–259 (252–254) |jstor=43853037 |url=https://www.academia.edu/27010916}}

* {{cite book |last=Cartwright |first=Nancy |author-link=Nancy Cartwright |date=1999 | title=The dappled world: a study of the boundaries of science |___location=New York |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |isbn=978-0-521-64336-8 |oclc=40305531 |doi=10.1017/CBO9781139167093}}

* {{cite SEP |last=Cat |first=Jordi |date=2017 |url-id=scientific-unity |title=The unity of science |edition=Fall 2017}}

* {{cite journal |last=Dupré |first=John |author-link=John Dupré |date=July 1983 |title=The disunity of science |journal=[[Mind (journal)|Mind]] |volume=92 |issue=367 |pages=321–346 |jstor=2253810 |doi=10.1093/mind/XCII.367.321|doi-access=free }}

Line 33 ⟶ 35:

* {{cite book |last=Feyerabend |first=Paul |date=2011 |chapter=The disunity of science |title=The tyranny of science |___location=Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA |publisher=[[Polity Press]] |pages=[https://archive.org/details/tyrannyofscience0000feye/page/32 32–63] |isbn=978-0745651897 |oclc=668946683 |url=https://archive.org/details/tyrannyofscience0000feye |url-access=registration |chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/tyrannyofscience0000feye/page/32 |chapter-url-access=registration}}

* {{cite journal |last=Fodor |first=Jerry A. |author-link=Jerry Fodor |date=October 1974 |title=Special sciences (or: The disunity of science as a working hypothesis) |journal=[[Synthese]] |volume=28 |issue=2 |pages=97–115 |doi=10.1007/BF00485230 |jstor=20114958 |s2cid=46979938|url=https://philarchive.org/rec/FODSSO-2 }} Reprinted in {{harvnb|Boyd|Gasper|Trout|1991}}.

* {{cite book |last=Keller |first=Evelyn Fox |author-link=Evelyn Fox Keller |date=2002 |title=Making sense of life: explaining biological development with models, metaphors, and machines |___location=Cambridge, MA |publisher=Harvard University Press |isbn=978-0-674-00746-8 |oclc=48100379 |jstor=j.ctvjz82ht |url=https://archive.org/details/makingsenseoflif00kell |url-access=registration}}

* {{cite journal |last=Kitchener |first=Richard F. |date=September 1981 |title=The nature and scope of genetic epistemology |journal=[[Philosophy of Science (journal)|Philosophy of Science]] |volume=48 |issue=3 |pages=400–415 (413) |jstor=186987 |doi=10.1086/289007 |s2cid=144785292 |quote=Nowhere does Piaget suggest that sociology can be reduced to psychology, but instead refers to 'psycho-sociology'.}}

* {{cite SEP |last=Ludwig |first=David |last2=Ruphy |first2=Stéphanie |date=2021 |url-id=scientific-pluralism |title=Scientific pluralism |edition=Fall 2024}}

* {{cite book |last1=Oppenheim |first1=Paul |author-link1=Paul Oppenheim |last2=Putnam |first2=Hilary |author-link2=Hilary Putnam |date=1958 |chapter=Unity of science as a working hypothesis |editor-last=Feigl |editor-first=Herbert |editor-link=Herbert Feigl |title=Concepts, theories and the mind–body problem |series=Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science |volume=2 |___location=Minneapolis |publisher=[[University of Minnesota Press]] |pages=3–36 |hdl=11299/184622 |isbn=9780816601585 |oclc=2669746 |chapter-url=https://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/184622}} Reprinted in {{harvnb|Boyd|Gasper|Trout|1991}}.

* {{Cite book |last=Piaget |first=Jean |author-link=Jean Piaget |date=1918 |title=Recherche |___location=Lausanne |publisher=Édition La Concorde |page=59 |oclc=2565864 |access-date=9 February 2017 |url=http://www.fondationjeanpiaget.ch/fjp/site/textes/VE/JP_18_Recherche.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160629025055/http://www.fondationjeanpiaget.ch/fjp/site/textes/VE/JP_18_Recherche.pdf |archive-date=2016-06-29 |url-status=live |language=fr}}

* {{cite book |editor1-last=Symons |editor1-first=John |editor2-last=Pombo |editor2-first=Olga |editor3-last=Torres |editor3-first=Juan Manuel |date=2011 |title=Otto Neurath and the unity of science |series=Logic, epistemology, and the unity of science |volume=18 |___location=Dordrecht; New York |publisher=[[Springer-Verlag]] |isbn=9789400701427 |oclc=723045353 |doi=10.1007/978-94-007-0143-4}}

* {{cite book |last=Tahko |first=Tuomas E. |date=2021 |title=Unity of science |series=Cambridge elements in the philosophy of science |___location=Cambridge, UK; New York |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |isbn=9781108713382 |oclc=1204142197 |doi=10.1017/9781108581417 |doi-access=free}}

* {{cite book |last=Wilson |first=Malcolm |date=2000 |title=Aristotle's theory of the unity of science |series=Phoenix, supplementary volume |volume=38 |___location=Toronto |publisher=[[University of Toronto Press]] |isbn=0802047963 |oclc=43634904 |doi=10.3138/9781442670990}}

{{refend}}

Line 55 ⟶ 59:

*{{PhilPapers|category|unity-of-science|Unity of Science}}

*[https://www.lib.uchicago.edu/e/scrc/findingaids/view.php?eadid=ICU.SPCL.USM Guide to the Unity of Science Movement Records 1934–1968] at the [https://www.lib.uchicago.edu/scrc/ University of Chicago Special Collections Research Center]

{{Philosophy of science}}

{{Positivism}}